I've spent a good part of my day, today, searching out dinghy/tender/lifeboat options. Why? Because I can; and because it is something which interests me, and because it is of interest to the boating public at large. There is a large amount of discussion amongst cruisers about dinghies, somewhat less about self-rescue boats/rafts and less, still, about dinghies AS self-rescue boats.
Common threads on dinghies include how to secure them to the boat both for theft-prevention and storage during passage, launch and retrieval, and desired feature set (capacity, weight, propulsion methods). Of course, there is the never-ending debate of hard-shell vs. rubber inflatable (RIB). The general consensus is that it should carry four to six persons, be easily launched and retrieved, able to be rowed or sailed, able to mount an outboard, easily repaired when punctured, low-cost and rugged. That's a pretty demanding list on its own. To my thinking, all of these criteria are only met by a hard-shell dinghy (ever try to row a RIB? how about sail one?). Yet, the RIB is far and away the most popular choice, today.
The discussion of self-rescue craft, on the other hand, centers around crew capacity, survival stocks and tools (signaling, food, water, etc), meeting SOLAS and/or USCG requirements, self-inflation reliability, complaints about inspection expenses and, sometimes, storage location and methods. Mostly, it seems, there are gripes about the expense of repacking them after inspection. Almost never is there a mention of ability to move and navigate under it's own, or the crew's, power.
In the ages of sail, steam and early days of diesel, your dinghy/tender was also your lifeboat. There was no expectation of rescue by a third party (no long-range signaling devices such as radio, EPIRBs and SARTs; and very few vessels fast enough to reach you in a matter of hours) unless you were really close to a populated coastline with a lifesaving corps (fishing ports, naval facilities). You dinghy had to be weatherly, stable, have capacity for food and water stores and able to be rowed or sailed for a long distance. In other words, your dinghy/tender had to allow you to self-rescue.
Apparently, there have been three designers who think these old-fashioned self-rescue ideas are good and still valid, even today. Steven Callahan (survivor of a 76 day ordeal in a life raft - read his book Adrift: Seventy-six Days Lost at Sea) (I earn a few pennies if you buy from this link.) has designed and prototyped what he calls the FRIB. It is not yet available (if ever) and there are no construction plans for the DIY boater. There's the Portland Pudgy, which is commercially available, now, but has no construction plans for the DIY boater. John Holtrop sells DIY plans for his Wave Dancer Life Dory. All three are hard-shell craft. All three are able to be driven by oar or sail, thereby making possible (if not necessarily likely) rescue without additional aid. FRIB and Portland Pudgy include built-in floatation compartments and are, theoretically, unsinkable. Wave Dancer could be built with floatation. Any of the three can attach to a drogue to keep it lined up to wind and waves, vastly increasing their stability at sea, especially in poor weather.
FRIB is not available. Portland Pudgy is expensive and considered too heavy for use as a small tender by many. Pudgy meets SOLAS/USCG regs as a four-person rescue boat. FRIB will likely meet those regs as a three-to-four person rescue boat. Wave Dancer is unlikely to ever meet those regs because of inspection and other issues; in other words - no agency is likely to certify it to meet safety gear requirements, no matter how well built it is.
Price. Wave Dancer can be built for less than US$600. FRIB is unavailable. Pudgies start at US$2500 (bare boat, no safety stuff or sails). A typical eight-to-ten foot hard shell dinghy costs US$1000 (+/- 200) and about that much again for a sail package (if available). Some have inflatable tubes available allowing it be configured for use as a lifeboat, in theory. Four-person self-inflating, SOLAS/USCG approved, life rafts start at about US$1000, pluse storage valise, plus annual expenses of recertification and repacking. Four-person RIBs start at near US$1000 and very few have accessories for turning them into capable row/sail craft, let alone adding other self-rescue capabilities and safety features.
The search and rescue (SAR) assets of the developed world are spread pretty thin. Unless the vessel is within a few hundred miles of a SAR base, the crew are likely to be waiting days for rescue. In less developed areas, there may be no SAR assets in place at all. Crews are certainly on their own in mid-ocean. Steven Callahan was never more than 200 miles out of the shipping lanes, but he could not maneuver his life raft into them where he had some hope of recovery. If he had had a sail, he could have self-evacuated to a nearby island in about a week; somewhat longer if he'd had oars and a moderately efficient hull shape. Instead, he spent 76 days adrift and completely at the whim of wind and wave.
There are plenty of large, ridgid hull self-rescue craft, suitable for big ships with big crews. It is a wonder why the commercial fishing and yachting worlds have not demanded similar craft. Okay, Steven Callahan didn't have an EPIRB or SAR transponder; nor even a hand-held VHF radio. Certainly these would have decreased the time he awaited rescue. These electronic wonders are fantastic but electronics fail, batteries run down and even with these toys, tides and wind could move you out of rescue range.
It's past time for some competition in the self-rescue craft suitable for fishing boats and yachts market. The rules are here: http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg5/cg5214/boatrb.asp. I'm both not qualified and without the resources to do it myself. Small-boat designers, that means you. Get on it.
